Discussion Forum

‹ Previous | Next › 1 2

Discussion: Discuss How to Create a Super Hero

Showing oldest comments first. Display newest comments first.

Use this thread to discuss the excerpt How to Create a Super Hero by Jennifer Mills.

Others may not have read this excerpt yet, so please use [spoiler][/spoiler] tags where appropriate.

System over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 04, '08 at 06:25 PM

I'm pleased people have been taking time to review my book. I wanted to say a few things about children's writing, because not everyone gets it.

Writing for children required a different set of skills to writing fiction for adults. Many skills are across the board of course but often adult writers will comment on how simple my language and/or sentence structure is. This is deliberate as I am keeping the ability of the target reader in mind.

I'd also liek to respond to the reviews I've had so far. I feel they have been (on the whole) quite complimentary with some pointers on how to make my writing better (good pointers too, thankyou). But one thing I find a little off putting by this system (and perhaps a reason it's not going to work for me ... but who knows) is that the people reviewing are mostly writers themselves and NOT my target audience. I doubt there will be many 8 to 12 year olds using this site. I ask that if you are going to review, remember who would be reading the book (maybe a good question to ask yourself is would a mother buy it for their child, or a teacher for their class for example).

OK that's my 2 cents worth.

Jennifer Mills's active submissions:
How to Create a Super Hero

Jennifer Mills over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 03:34 AM

You make an excellent point about who is doing the reviews. This is one of my complaints with critique circles and creative writing classes. It is way too easy for, so called, experts to miss the point and ruin something that would be quite acceptable to real readers. That is one of the reasons we created this site. We want real readers to pick the books they like to read. I encourage my kids to come to the site and pick the books they like. They are a bit older than your demographic, but there is no reason why kids (Or their parents, since that is who will actually make the purchase) can't come here.


Gary

Gary over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 10:17 AM

Hi Gary, I had the same concern as Jennifer. I just submitted THE LITTLE GOOD OLD BOY, my first foray into this genre. I've actually been working on this one, polishing it etc. for a very long time. Jennifer is right; writing for this segment of the population is a whole new ball game. I'm hoping adult readers won't skip it just because it's a children's/YA chapter book. I think it might actually have some appeal to adults as well, and it would be great if those who have children--nieces,nephews... were encouraged to review these excerpts. We need to introduce them to the concept of e-publishing and get them accustomed to reading a book from a screen. I say this because, it took some time for me to get used to this, but now it's very comfortable.

Jan's active submissions:
STALKING YOLANDA (revised), How to Get a Life

Jan over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 10:28 AM

I guess what is really important is to get readers here as well as writers. I've seen some sites where the only people reviewing and reading one anothers work are the writers. Sometimes what happens is that someone will give a book (or piece of work) a bad review. The writer of that work will then search out the reviewer's work and post a revenge review, picking the work to pieces out of spite. Of course I don't do that, but I'm always curious about the work of a writer who reviews. What they write is a good indication of what they like to read usually. I'm really glad to hear that a few non favourable reviews here won't disqualify good reviews ... because lets face it, reading is a very personal taste thing.

Jennifer Mills's active submissions:
How to Create a Super Hero

Jennifer Mills over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 11:25 AM

In another thread, Jennifer says:

(forgive me if this is a double post) Cloister, I know this probably isn't the place to do this, but I can't find any other way to contact you. I wanted to thank you for the review on 'How to create a super hero (it's a shame you dind't rate it at all though, it's brought my average down). The suggestions were really helpful.

I really have to apologize for that. It was late at night, I was tired, and I just forgot to fill in the stars. Usually what I do is I read a submission and I open the review form in another window so that I can jot down notes and copy bits of text I want to talk about before I forget. Anyway, I got so into typing up the review that I clicked "submit" before I remembered to go back and fill in the stars and extra points.

If this site ever does let people go back and update their reviews, I'll definitely do that for you.


Sign up for National Novel Writing Month at www.nanowrimo.org starting October 1!

Cloister's active submissions:
The Fallen

Cloister over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 03:13 PM

Oh, and as to Jennifer's concern about "revenge reviews", yeah I guess that's always a possibility. I would hope, however, that people who decide this is a fun site to hang out on and contribute to are more mature than that.

By now I've reviewed almost everything on this site. Much of it is totally outside of the genres I've ever written in. But I have to say, I've found some interesting and amazing stuff here by doing that. Things I would never have sought out on my own but I'm glad I had a chance to see.

There's a selfish angle as well: I also think that it's tremendously useful for me as a writer to be exposed to the styles and talents of lots of other people. Whether it's seeing a hugely clever strategy for dealing with what would otherwise be in infodump (like you pulled off in your submission) or whether it's seeing some other excerpt crash-and-burn, I always learn something about what to do or what to avoid. And that makes me a better writer.

I can't speak for anyone else, but you won't see me doing a revenge review. If someone hates my submission, that's ok. The book just isn't for them. And like Gary said in that other thread, negative reviews don't actually hurt anything. Well, except maybe my pride, but if I'm going to post my work on a review-oriented website, I'd better be at least a little bit thick-skinned about it, eh?


Sign up for National Novel Writing Month at www.nanowrimo.org starting October 1!

Cloister's active submissions:
The Fallen

Cloister over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 03:26 PM

Absolutely, Cloister. It's so important to stay open to criticism. I've learned so much already. I tried to clean up my infodumps, and I resubmitted my Children's/YA novel, but I have to admit, Jenny's HOW TO CREATE A SUPER HERO has more action right from the very beginning than my chapter book, THE LITTLE GOOD OLD BOY. And I'm also aware that there are still some subtle infodumps in those first 5000 words. I need to get into the real action sooner. I'm struggling with this genre. Anyway, I recommend HOW TO CREATE A SUPER HERO. Adults as well as children, will enjoy it.

Jan's active submissions:
STALKING YOLANDA (revised), How to Get a Life

Jan over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 05, '08 at 04:15 PM

I have to say,Jennifer, as a young adult reader I'm kind of cheesed that you think you need to dumb things down for us. I've been told that I'm a good reader but i never would have gotten that way if the authors that I read said "oh I'd better make that sentence simpler so that the poor kids can understand it."

Elspeth over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 07, '08 at 08:49 PM

Oh no Elspeth I'm not saying that about young adult readers so much as those readers who are still learning. There is enough competition with electronic games as it is without alienating a few more hundreds who aren't the best readers. Those children who can cope with more adult sentence structures will be readers no matter how hard or easy you make it for them. Don't get me wrong, there are many levels of writing for children, from the most simple to the most complex. But there is a very good reason that books like 'Captain Underpants' and 'Beast Quest' have a large readership, they can be read by a wide range of readers (the lower end of abilities don't get left out).

As for young adult readers, I wouldn't 'dumb it down' for most of them. 'young adult' is a totally different category to 'children's'. However there are even young adult books that cater for older readers who don't have a wonderful vocabulary or ability to unwind complex sentences, that is because 'young adult' is a category because of the issues in the stories, rather than the level of it's readership. At least, it is in Australia, perhpas it is different in other countries.

Jennifer Mills's active submissions:
How to Create a Super Hero

Jennifer Mills over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 08, '08 at 12:44 AM

That sounds better but for me it was always those books that did have a little harder sentence structure that pushed me to become a better reader. I understand that there are people who would be more comfortable with a simpler structure but it kind of hits me where I live to hear people say stuff like "writers will comment on how simple my language and/or sentence structure is. This is deliberate as I am keeping the ability of the target reader in mind." I'll admit though, I've always read older people books because I can't make the kids ones last long enough.

Elspeth over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 08, '08 at 05:13 PM

Captain Underpants is listed as a children's book. A lot of different ages read it simply because they find t entertaining. I am also a teen, which is what a young adult is. A young adult is someone who is 15-19. I read books that range from small childrens books, to college texts. The only reason people would buy your book if they were able to write a book like twilight or eragon. And neither of those books were simple and were targeted towards young adults. The people you want to buy your book are the people that can read, otherwise you're just another see spot run. Shakespeare and the Bible are the two most well sold books and were used to teach people how to read. The people you are targeting won't even reach your book.

Chaos_reigns's active submissions:
(K)Night School (revised)

Chaos_reigns over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 08, '08 at 10:40 PM

There's a difference between writing with an eye towards maximizing a younger reader's chance to, as the saying goes, "read the same story that the writer is trying to tell" and dumbing it down.

The former is a laudable goal. The latter is condescending and insulting to one's audience.

To my way of thinking, writing with an eye towards maximizing the reader's chances to get what you're after is a matter of, essentially, grammar. It's about the surface level of the writing, the subtle language and sentence choices you make that either enhance or detract from clarity. It doesn't mean you have to write "see spot run" sentences. It doesn't mean you have to infodump. IMHO, when writing for children you should absolutely use colorful, evocative language. Use sentences with direct and indirect objects and the occasional subordinate clause. That's fine. Just don't forget that the ultimate goal is to writing the cleanest, clearest prose you can that is still lively and entertaining.

This next part is about dumbing things down, and strays into cranky old man rant territory, so I'll spoiler it for the faint-hearted:

Dumbing it down, to my way of thinking, is a matter of content. It's about believing (wrongly, let me be clear) that the audience is too thick-headed to comprehend the subtle complexities of your masterful piece of literature unless you spoon-feed them information that you would expect an adult reader to infer from context. That, frankly, is an insult and I have just about zero patience for that kind of crap. A writer should never insult or underestimate their audience like that. Worse, writers who disrespect their audience that much tend, as a rule, not to put as much effort into their writing, either. Having decided they need to spoon feed everything to the reader, they feel relieved of the burden of looking for subtle and natural ways to convey setting and character backstory, with the inevitable result that they infodump all over the place.

This, I suspect, is why I get so cranky about infodumps. Because I cannot help but see them as an insulting insight into the writer's estimation of their audience.

So write for children, yes. Even write differently for children, when that is called for. But heaven help anyone who dumbs their writing down because their audience is younger and then has the temerity to post that work here, because I'll have no problem saying exactly what I think about it.Show spoiler


Sign up for National Novel Writing Month at www.nanowrimo.org; novel writing starts November 1st!

Cloister's active submissions:
The Fallen

Cloister over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 09, '08 at 12:31 PM

Yay! Thanks Cloister, that's really what I was trying to get across except wothout the excuse of being a cranky old man:).

Elspeth over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 09, '08 at 06:02 PM

I agree with Elspeth, you put it so well, Cloister! I also want to point out that most young adults are very good at reading, they just hate doing it. So, you have to make it more exciting, not more simple.

Chaos_reigns's active submissions:
(K)Night School (revised)

Chaos_reigns over 3 years ago Posted on Oct 09, '08 at 11:47 PM

Respond

You must be logged in to post a response on this discussion.

Website designed and implemented by Ravenna Interactive